← back to the tool · all reviewer documents
Does Development Pay for Itself?
Howard County Fiscal Impact Model, Assumptions Working Document
v0.2 (2026-08-10). Fills Jeremy Dommu's v0.1 draft (2026-08-10) with sourced values. Prepared for The Merriweather Post / Eric DeMenthon collaboration.
Working rules (Eric, 2026-08-10): every value carries a source tag [S#] resolving in the Sources appendix, which states how to verify it manually. No value is invented: if no source was found, the cell says OPEN and stays open for discussion.
Status legend - VERIFIED: we read the primary document ourselves (page cited). - REPORTED: a research pass confirmed it against the cited URL; not yet re-read by a human. Promote to VERIFIED by following the how-to-verify step in the appendix. - DERIVED: computed from VERIFIED/REPORTED inputs; the formula is shown. Judge the formula, not just the inputs. - OPEN: no source yet. Do not use.
1. Scope (decided, per v0.1)
Unchanged from Jeremy's draft: single discrete project; full stabilization in Year 1 (no absorption curve, no phasing); one-time revenues booked in Year 1; annual net held flat across a 30-year window; current law only (SOUP and other pending proposals are future toggles, not defaults).
v0.2 proposes three scope additions, argued in section 9: a discounting decision (D5), a resale-revenue decision (D6), and a fund-scope decision (D7). None are settled here.
2. Student count methodology (Years 1-30)
| Assumption | Value / Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 yield (new construction), countywide | SFD 0.7581, SFA/TH 0.4112, rental apt 0.1447, condo apt 0.1447 students/unit. By school level and planning area: full table in section 8.7. VERIFIED, but 2015-17 construction vintage; freshest public table that exists | [S1] p. 59, Table A-10 (HCPSS Office of School Planning, 2018) |
| Years 2-30 yield (resale/turnover) | OPEN. EFMP confirms the two-stage convention exists (new-construction yields in first occupancy year, then folded into resale/turnover pools) but publishes no numeric table. Ask HCPSS OSP: Daniel Lubeley, Timothy Rogers; records request if needed | [S8] pp. 40-41 (convention only) |
| Apartment treatment | v0.1 simplification kept: one flat rate from Year 1. Note the A-10 apartment rate is itself a new-construction (2015-17 units) figure | [S1] p. 59 |
| Student trend over 30 yrs | Held flat (v0.1 decision). Known bias: county births/enrollment declining, so flat overstates long-run students. See bias ledger | [S8] |
| Yield by rent tier / bedrooms | OPEN as a tier split; A-10 has no rent or bedroom breakout. Available proxy: planning-area column (rental apt 0.0508 Columbia vs 0.3400 Ellicott City, 6.7x spread) | [S1] p. 59 |
| Age-restricted (55+) yield | OPEN for the exact HCPSS/DPZ convention. Supporting fact: county planning uses 1.70 persons/household for age-restricted units | [S1] p. 58, Table A-8 |
3. Revenue, one-time (Year 1)
| Assumption | Value / Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| County transfer tax | 1.25% of consideration (since 7/1/2020). REPORTED. Fully earmarked: 25% school land/construction, 25% parks, 20% ag preservation, 15% housing/community development, 15% fire. It is county revenue but never General Fund revenue: see D7. First-time-buyer carve-outs: OPEN | [S2][S11] |
| State transfer tax | 0.5% (0.25% first-time buyer). REPORTED. State revenue, so excluded from a county-fisc model; listed to avoid double counting in "2.25% total deed tax" figures | [S11] |
| Recordation tax | $2.50 per $500 of value (0.5%). REPORTED. Note: the county's 2019 model treats recordation as RECURRING operating revenue (resales + refinancings), not one-time: decision D6 | [S2]; [S1] p. 55 |
| School facility surcharge | $8.63/sq ft regular, FY27 schedule effective 7/1/2026. Reduced rates: non-affordable senior $1.32; MIHU on-site outside Downtown Columbia $2.88; Downtown Columbia affordable $4.98; state/county-funded affordable non-senior $2.88. REPORTED. Resolves v0.1 flag: CPI-indexed annually per CB42-2019, resets July 1; Jeremy's $8.15 was the prior-year (FY26) rate. Implication of A-4 sizes: a new countywide-average SFD (5,465 sf) pays ~$47k | [S4]; indexing [S4]; sizes [S1] p. 56 |
| Road (multimodal) excise tax | $1.96/gross sq ft residential and office/retail; $1.00 distribution/manufacturing and institutional. County Code 20.503, CR 94-2026, FY27 schedule. REPORTED | [S5] |
| Building permit / plan review (DILP) | Residential SF new construction $0.25/gross sq ft; multifamily and other new construction $0.30/sq ft; filing fee $100 residential / $200 commercial; +10% technology fee on all permits; $50 guaranty fund fee on MD Home Builder residential applications. FY27 schedule (CR 83-2026), effective 7/1/2026. VERIFIED. Confirms v0.1 lean: minor (a 2,400 sf SFD pays ~$770 vs ~$20.7k surcharge) | [S19] |
| MIHU fee-in-lieu (new line, v0.2) | $3.77 per sq ft of residential space for each unit when a development pays in lieu of building on-site MIHUs (Code 13.402C; CR 97-2026; ENR-Baltimore indexed annually; FY27, eff 7/1/2026). VERIFIED. Affordable housing now has three modeled paths: market-rate; on-site MIHU (reduced surcharge $2.88/sf + lower unit values per A-6); or fee-in-lieu (this line + full market values) | [S20] |
| Water/sewer connection charges | OPEN on fund status. Known: water/sewer is the Metropolitan District (separate $0.08/$100 ad valorem inside the district), an enterprise-style arrangement, supporting the v0.1 lean to exclude. Confirm connection-charge fund before deciding (D3) | [S3] |
4. Revenue, recurring (annual)
| Assumption | Value / Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Real property tax | County General Fund $1.044 per $100 AV (VERIFIED) + Fire Fund $0.206 (REPORTED; separate special fund, confirming v0.1's suspicion: see D7) + state $0.112 (REPORTED, state revenue, exclude). Sensitivity: 1 cent on the county rate = ~$6.5M/yr countywide | [S2][S3] |
| Assessment mechanics | SDAT triennial reassessment; increases phase in over 3 years, decreases immediate; Homestead cap 5% county / 10% state, owner-occupied only (rentals uncapped); apartments/commercial valued by income approach. REPORTED. Under a constant-dollar model (D5) most of this matters only if real appreciation is assumed | [S10] |
| County income tax | 3.2% of Maryland taxable income, flat, no brackets (VERIFIED via county FAQ; v0.1 had it from budget.dementhon.com). Household income by unit type: OPEN as a current value; candidate methodology exists: the 2019 county study derived income from mortgage qualification at the unit's price point (2018 values in section 8.4; renter analog needed). This remains the biggest recurring-revenue input to settle | [S2]; method [S1] pp. 57-58 |
| Recordation, recurring portion | Decision D6. County 2019 model books recordation per housing unit as an annual operating revenue line | [S1] p. 55 |
| State aid to county / highway user | OPEN. 2026-08-10 scout pass found nothing citable (these line items live in PDF budget documents scouts cannot parse); next source: the county government FY26 Approved Operating Budget revenue schedules (note: distinct from the HCPSS budget book we hold). Also note for later refinement: Blueprint education aid keys to county wealth per pupil, so high-value development slightly reduces state aid share across all pupils (second-order, candidate footnote toggle, not v1) | none yet |
| Energy tax / franchise fees | CLOSED as a per-household line: no county utility, energy, or telephone tax found; the county's own household tax/fee enumeration lists none. Cable franchise fees exist but are paid by the cable operator (Local Franchising Authority arrangement), not billed to households. REPORTED (negative finding; scout pass 2026-08-10) | [S21] |
| Flat household fees | Trash $391/yr full service; Watershed Protection Fee $40 (TH/apt/condo) to $115-$225 (SFD by lot). REPORTED. Only include if the matching services are included on the cost side (D3): fee-funded pairs should net out | [S3][S13] |
| General fund context | GF is ~47% property tax + ~45% income tax (~92% combined); FY26 GF total $1.63B. REPORTED. Useful as a sanity anchor: the model's revenue lines should reproduce roughly this mix for a representative unit | [S9][S17] |
5. Expenses, education
| Assumption | Value / Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| HCPSS cost per pupil | $21,640 budgeted per-pupil expenditure FY26 ($120.22/day). VERIFIED (budget book p. 14). This is the ALL-funds figure (state + county + federal), not the county's marginal cost | [S7] p. 14 |
| County share of HCPSS | County appropriation $816.005M FY26 (FY25: $766.0M, +6.53%). VERIFIED (p. 39). State aid $375.4M REPORTED | [S7] p. 39; [S6] |
| County appropriation per pupil | DERIVED: $816.005M / 57,031 enrolled = ~$14,308/pupil/yr. Formula shown; whether this average is the right cost base is exactly decision D1 (marginal vs average) | [S7] p. 39; enrollment [S8] |
| Enrollment counting convention | New construction counted in first occupancy year at new-construction yields, then folded into resale/turnover/pre-K pools. VERIFIED by Jeremy against EFMP (primary) | [S8] pp. 40-41 |
| School capital cost per seat | DERIVED benchmark: Guilford Park HS (opened 2023) $129M / 1,650 seats = ~$78k/seat. REPORTED inputs; a subcontractor page says $104M (likely construction contract vs total project): use $129M total-project until primary CIP doc is pulled. County 2019 model charged school debt service PER SEAT BY CAPACITY (capacity-sensitive), other debt per capita | [S12]; method [S1] p. 55 |
| State share of school construction | State cost share for Howard County: 54% (FY2025), 51% (FY2026) of ELIGIBLE costs per COMAR 14.39.02.06 ("Howard 54% 51%"). Eligible is capped by formula (COMAR 14.39.02.07): lesser of gross-area baseline (approved enrollment x IAC baseline sq ft/student) or actual area, times the statewide average per-sq-ft school cost, plus site development, times the share %. REPORTED (scout pass; promote via official COMAR at dsd.maryland.gov). Note (commentary, not sourced): eligible per-sf baselines typically run below actual HoCo costs, so the effective state share of TOTAL project cost is lower than 51%. Actual Guilford Park split: still OPEN (scout found nothing; likely lives in the county capital budget PDF) | [S22] |
| Age-restricted, revenue side | Do not model seniors as pure cost savings: senior surcharge rate is $1.32/sf (vs $8.63) and the county offers a 25% senior (65+, income-limited) credit and 20% Aging-in-Place credit (to $650k AV) on county property tax. REPORTED. Symmetric honesty: senior projects have lower school costs AND lower revenues | [S4][S16] |
6. Expenses, public safety
| Assumption | Value / Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Police cost per capita | OPEN pending D2 (allocation method). Population denominator now REPORTED: ~339,183 (Census Vintage-2025 estimate, July 1 2025); persons/household 2.76 (ACS 2019-23). Ingredients in hand: FY24 approved budget by department/fund/object (local data, [S18]); FY26 GF total [S17] | [S18][S23] |
| Fire / EMS | Fire is a separate special fund with its own $0.206 levy (REPORTED), so v0.1's flag was right: under an all-funds scope (D7), fire costs net against fire-fund revenue rather than loading the General Fund | [S2][S3] |
| Judicial / detention | OPEN. v0.1 lean (immaterial per capita) plausible, unverified | none yet |
7. Expenses, public works and general government
| Assumption | Value / Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Road maintenance | OPEN pending D2. Ingredient: DPW lines in [S18]. Note many arterials are state (SHA) roads and many subdivisions have private/HOA streets: allocation needs care | [S18] |
| Solid waste / recycling | OPEN on fund status; trash fee ($391) exists, so leaning fee-funded and excluded net (D3) | [S3] |
| Stormwater | OPEN on fund status; Watershed Protection Fee exists, same netting logic (D3) | [S13] |
| General government overhead | OPEN pending D2. v0.1 candidate ((GF minus itemized) / population) is an average-cost method; fine for v1 if labeled as such. Local quirk to handle: the Columbia Association privately funds much rec/parks inside Columbia | [S18]; CA quirk: discuss |
8. Supporting estimate tables (county 2019 study, constant 2018 dollars)
All VERIFIED against [S1] (pages cited), but 2015-2018 vintage: usable as defaults only with an "as-of 2018, refresh pending" label and a slider. Countywide values; per planning-area detail is in the study.
- Unit sizes (A-4, p. 56): new SFD 5,465 sf; SFA 2,586; apt 1,458.
- Unit values (A-5, p. 57): SFD $802,149; SFA $511,429; rental apt $198,000/unit; condo $340,671.
- MIHU values (A-6, p. 57): SFA $311,000; rental $161,000; condo $246,000 (no SFD MIHU). This is the affordable-vs-market input Jeremy's spec wants.
- Homeowner income needed (A-7, p. 58): SFD $178,748; SFA $115,081; condo $77,548; (renter figure $47,134 listed). Mortgage-qualification method; the candidate answer to the income-by-unit-type gap.
- Household size (A-8, p. 58): SFD 3.16 (2025 col.); SFA 2.63; apt 2.05; age-restricted 1.70.
- Occupancy (A-9, p. 59): SFD 98%, SFA 97%, apt 96%.
- Student yields (A-10, p. 59): full table, students per unit by school level:
| Type | Level | Countywide | Columbia | Elkridge | Ellicott City | Rural West | Southeast |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFD | ES | 0.4863 | 0.5000 | 0.4563 | 0.5493 | 0.5735 | 0.3778 |
| SFD | MS | 0.1769 | 0.1923 | 0.1688 | 0.1910 | 0.2322 | 0.1212 |
| SFD | HS | 0.0949 | 0.0385 | 0.1063 | 0.0806 | 0.1090 | 0.0949 |
| SFD | Total | 0.7581 | 0.7308 | 0.7314 | 0.8209 | 0.9147 | 0.5939 |
| SFA | Total | 0.4112 | 0.3421 | 0.3751 | 0.6401 | n/a | 0.3334 |
| Rental apt | Total | 0.1447 | 0.0508 | 0.1834 | 0.3400 | n/a | 0.1834 |
| Condo apt | Total | 0.1447 | 0.0508 | 0.1834 | 0.3400 | n/a | 0.1834 |
(SFA/apt level splits are in the study; Southeast apartments borrow the Elkridge average per study note. Yields from units built 2015-2017.)
- The 2019 study's own per-unit results (Table 2, p. 7), the cross-check target: annual operating net: SFD +$5,047.87, SFA +$3,520.74, rental apt +$941.94, condo +$4,133.70. One-time capital revenue: SFD $21,484.35, SFA $11,378.86, rental $5,588.00, condo $6,957.04. Ratio form: $1.38 / $1.45 / $1.25 / $2.14 of operating revenue per $1.00 of services. Constant 2018 dollars, pre-PAYGO adjustment. v0 of our model should reproduce these numbers from the study's own inputs before we swap in current values.
- 2025-26 market anchors (REPORTED, scout pass 2026-08-10). All-transaction figures, NOT new-construction: current new-unit values remain OPEN, these bound them from below. Countywide median sold price $634,500 (May 2026, +5.8% YoY, Howard County Assn of REALTORS); median $675,850 / average $760,154 (June 2026, Maryland REALTORS via secondary cite, weaker). Columbia rents (Zumper, Aug 2026): average apartment $2,255/mo, median $2,538, 1BR $1,905, 2BR ~$2,226-2,260. Compare A-5's 2018 new-SFD value $802k: new construction carries a large premium over the resale median, so do not substitute these medians for new-unit values.
- The study's multiplier map (p. 55), i.e. its model skeleton: transfer + surcharge
- road excise = one-time capital revenue per unit; property tax per unit; income tax per unit by household income; recordation per unit RECURRING; fire fund per unit; all other revenue per capita. Costs: school debt service per seat by capacity; other debt service per capita; school operating per unit by yields; all other operating per capita.
9. Open methodology decisions
D1-D4 are Jeremy's; D5-D9 added in v0.2. None decided.
- D1. Marginal vs average cost (esp. school capital). The single biggest judgment call. v0.2 recommendation: dual-view, compute both bounds and show them side by side; capacity-aware marginal using APFO school utilization; never a single blended number.
- D2. Allocation bases for non-school operating lines (per capita vs per household vs fixed). The 2019 study used per-capita for "all other"; fine for v1 if labeled.
- D3. Enterprise/fee-funded exclusions (water/sewer, solid waste, stormwater): exclude service and its fee together, or include both; never one side only.
- D4. Mixed-use / non-residential scope: v1 residential-only. The study has workers-per-sq-ft machinery to borrow when commercial comes in.
- D5. Dollars and discounting. Adopt the study's constant-dollar convention (its 4-reason rationale, [S1] p. 43) plus a real-discount-rate slider (candidates 0-4%, default open). Present both cumulative real dollars and NPV. Without discounting, a Year-30 dollar equals a Year-1 dollar; a CPA reviewer will not accept that silently.
- D6. Resale/turnover deed revenue. v0.1 books deed taxes once in Year 1. The county's own model treats recordation as recurring. Options: (a) UA convention (recordation recurring, transfer one-time), (b) both recurring via a turnover-rate slider (~7-10 yr), (c) v0.1 as-is with the understatement logged in the bias ledger.
- D7. Fund scope. GF-only vs all-county-funds. v0.2 recommendation: all-funds county perspective (GF + Fire Fund netted against its levy + earmarked transfer shown by earmark + capital), because GF-only both overstates (transfer treated as GF) and understates (fire levy ignored). Display can still lead with GF.
- D8. Parameterization policy (the neutrality architecture): freeze FACTS (current law: rates, surcharges) with citations and an as-of stamp, no sliders; parameterize ESTIMATES (yields, incomes, values, turnover) with defaults = cited sources and slider ranges spanning credible sources; expose JUDGMENTS (D1, D5, D6, D7) as side-by-side modes, not buried defaults. Pending law (SOUP) is a labeled scenario toggle, distinct from editing current law. Every displayed number links to its [S#] and status. A "which inputs flip the sign" panel is a first-class output.
- D9. Backtest module. Reproduce the 2019 study, then compare its projections to FY19-FY25 actuals (we hold them in the budget-site data). No one does ex-post validation in this genre; this is the credibility feature.
10. Known biases ledger (v1 simplifications and their direction)
"Direction" = effect on the modeled answer to "does development pay for itself?"
| Simplification | Direction | Size guess |
|---|---|---|
| Flat student count, ignoring countywide enrollment decline | Against development (overstates school cost) | material over 30 yrs |
| Year-1-only deed taxes (if D6 stays v0.1) | Against development (understates revenue) | material for owner units |
| No absorption curve, full Year-1 stabilization | For development (front-loads revenue) | small, short-lived |
| Ignoring senior credits + reduced surcharge on age-restricted | For development (overstates senior-project revenue) | material for senior projects only |
| Excluding induced commercial-base growth (economic spillovers) | Against development | small (~1% order; MD routes sales tax to the state, income tax by residence) |
| Excluding congestion / service-quality externalities | For development | unquantified, qualitative |
| Average-cost school mode where slack capacity exists | Against development | large; D1 dual-view exists for this |
| Marginal-cost mode when a project trips a capacity threshold | For development | large; same remedy |
| 2018-vintage estimate tables used as defaults | Direction unknown (values and yields both moved) | refresh is the fix, not a sign flip |
Sources appendix
How-to-verify is the manual path; local copies live in /workspace/HoCo/refs/.
- [S1] "The Fiscal Impact of New Development in Howard County, Maryland" (Urban
Analytics; UBalt Jacob France Institute; Artemel & Associates; July 10, 2019).
Local:
refs/ua2019.pdf(+ extractedua2019.txt). Public:https://web.archive.org/web/20210314184822id_/https://www.howardcountymd.gov/Portals/0/Urban%20Anayltics%20Fiscal%20Impact%20Report%20for%20Howard%20County.pdf(county URL dead; "Anayltics" typo is original). Verify: open cited page; Table 2 p. 7, multipliers p. 55, A-4..A-10 pp. 56-59, constant-dollar rationale p. 43. Status: VERIFIED for every table quoted here (read 2026-08-10). - [S2] Howard County FY2026 Budget FAQ, howardcountymd.gov/budget/resource/frequently-asked-budget-questions. Rates, income tax 3.2%, transfer earmarks, personal property 2.610/0.515, 1-cent = $6.5M. Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S3] howardcountymd.gov/finance/real-property-tax (+ -faqs, /recordation-tax). Rates, Metropolitan District $0.08, trash fee $391. Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S4] FY27 Public School Facility Surcharge Rates (county PDF, 2026-06), howardcountymd.gov/sites/default/files/2026-06/FY27%20Public%20School%20Facility%20Surcharge%20Rates.pdf. $8.63 + reduced categories + CB42-2019 CPI indexing. Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S5] FY27 Excise Tax Fee Schedule (county PDF, 2026-06, CR 94-2026), howardcountymd.gov/sites/default/files/2026-06/FY27%20Excise%20Tax%20Fee%20Schedule.pdf. Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S6] HCPSS news, "Board adopts FY26 operating & capital budgets" (2025-06-12), news.hcpss.org. County $816.0M, state $375.4M. Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S7] HCPSS FY26 Board-Approved Operating Budget book. Local:
refs/fy26budget.pdf(777 pp). Verify: p. 14 (per-pupil $21,640, $120.22/day), p. 39 (County Revenue $816,005,000, +6.53% over FY25 $766.0M). VERIFIED 2026-08-10. - [S8] 2026 Educational Facilities Master Plan (HCPSS, June 2026). Local:
refs/efmp2026.pdf(247 pp, fetched 2026-08-10 from BoardDocs; needs a browser user agent). Convention pp. 40-41 (pages confirmed to discuss yields); enrollment 57,031; no per-unit yield table published. Status: VERIFIED by Jeremy; our copy now in repo for independent reads. - [S9] Spending Affordability Advisory Committee FY2026 Report (county PDF, 2025-02): GF mix ~47% property / ~45% income. Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S10] dat.maryland.gov (SDAT): triennial assessment + phase-in; Homestead caps (county 5% via howardcountymd.gov/finance/tax-credits); income-approach for apartments (SDAT assessment admin doc). Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S11] Transfer/recordation rate chart (gfrlaw.com, as of 2025-10) + county recordation page + 2020 increase history (liffwalsh.com). Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S12] Guilford Park HS cost/capacity: Baltimore Sun 2023-08-15; American School & University 2023-08-16 ($129M, 1,650 seats); discrepant $104M on sodyconcrete.com. Retrieved 2026-08-07. Better source wanted: county CIP project sheet (OPEN).
- [S13] cleanwaterhoward.com/watershed-protection-fee (CR 57-2024, CR 88-2026 schedule). Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S14] APFO Review Committee page + combined-votes doc (final report accepted 2025-08-13; SOUP ~$9.78-$17.93/sf proposed). Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S15] PlanHoward 2030 Fiscal Impact Analysis (DPZ, 2012-05-29). Local:
refs/planhoward2012.pdf. Second methodology datapoint; used ~$38.9k/student capital (2012$) and much lower yields: illustrates input drift across eras. - [S16] howardcountymd.gov/finance/tax-credits: Senior 25% credit (65+, income-limited), Aging-in-Place 20% (to $650k AV). Retrieved 2026-08-07.
- [S17] County press release News042125b (2025-04): FY26 GF $1.63B. Retrieved 2026-08-07.
-
[S18] Local data,
HoCo/hoco-transparency/data/:budget_fy2024.json(FY24 approved budget by function/department/object/fund),hoco.json(ACFR FY25 categories, per-school spending, vendors). Verify: open the JSON; totals reconcile to the ACFR figures cited on budget.dementhon.com. -
[S19] FY27 Building Permit Fee Schedule (DILP, CR 83-2026, eff. 7/1/2026). Local:
refs/fy27-building-permit-fees.pdf. Public: howardcountymd.gov /sites/default/files/2026-06/FY27%20Building%20Permit%20Fee%20Schedule_0.pdf (linked from /inspections-licenses-permits/forms-fees). Verify: p. 1. VERIFIED 2026-08-10. - [S20] FY27 MIHU Fee-In-Lieu Rate Schedule (DILP, CR 97-2026, Code 13.402C,
eff. 7/1/2026). Local:
refs/fy27-mihu-fee-in-lieu.pdf. Public: same directory, FY27%20Moderate%20Income%20Housing%20Fee%20-In-Lieu%20Rates.pdf. VERIFIED 2026-08-10. - [S21] Negative finding, scout pass 2026-08-10: howardcountymd.gov /finance/real-property-tax (household tax/fee enumeration, no utility/energy/ telephone tax) + /cable-administration (franchise fees paid by cable operator). REPORTED; promote by scanning County Code Title 20 for any utility levy.
- [S22] COMAR 14.39.02.06 (state cost-share by county: "Howard 54% 51%" for FY25/FY26) and 14.39.02.07 (maximum state construction allocation formula), via regs.maryland.gov mirror, scout-fetched 2026-08-10 with quote gate. Promote via official COMAR (dsd.maryland.gov) or iac.mdschoolconstruction.org.
- [S23] Population: US Census PEP Vintage-2025 estimate 339,183 (July 1, 2025; consistent across Wikipedia infobox, USAFacts, World Population Review, all citing Census); QuickFacts archive (web.archive.org 2025-02-04 capture): 336,001 (July 2023), persons/household 2.76 (ACS 2019-23). REPORTED; promote via census.gov PEP county table.
- [S24] Market anchors, scout pass 2026-08-10: hcar.org/pages/monthly-stats (May 2026 median $634,500); nextsteprealtymd.com citing Maryland REALTORS June 2026 ($675,850 median, $760,154 average; secondary); zumper.com/rent-research/ columbia-md (Aug 2026 rents). REPORTED; all-transaction, not new-construction.
Changelog
- v0.2.1, 2026-08-10 (scout pass): DILP permit fees and MIHU fee-in-lieu filled (VERIFIED, new PDFs in refs/); IAC state cost share 54%/51% of eligible costs (REPORTED); energy/utility tax closed as none-found; population ~339,183 and 2.76 persons/household (REPORTED); 2025-26 market anchors added (section 8.9). Still OPEN after scouts: Guilford Park state/county split and non-school state aid line items (both live in PDF budget books; frontier pull queued), first-time- buyer transfer carve-out, Y2-30 resale yields (needs HCPSS OSP ask).
- v0.2, 2026-08-10: values filled with sources and statuses; supporting tables from [S1]; decisions D5-D9, bias ledger, parameterization policy added. (Eric + Claude)
- v0.1, 2026-08-10: structure, scope decisions, research flags. (Jeremy Dommu, with
Claude; original:
refs/jeremy-assumptions-v0.1.docx)